Critical Review of Maslow’s Hierarchy Theory
Abraham Maslow suggested that human
needs exist at a number of different levels, from basic physiological needs
such as hunger, to higher level needs such as self-development and
self-fulfilment. People are motivated to achieve certain needs. When one need
is fulfilled a person seeks to fulfil the next one, and so on. Maslow’s theory,
believes that people possess a set of motivation systems without any rewards or
unconscious desires (Maslow,
1943).
Image from - www.ba-bamail.com
This pyramid starts with the basic
physiological needs such as shelter, air, food etc. And moves to safety needs
such as warmth etc. and climbs up to social needs and later esteem needs and
finally self-actualization. This pyramid shows us that people satisfy their
lowest level of needs ultimately it reaches the highest needs such as
self-actualization.
Critical evaluation of Maslow’s theory
There are some limitations concern
on his methodology used in his theory. In his methodology he has used qualitative
method called biographical analysis to prove his theory. In this biographical
analysis, he has developed qualities as characteristic of specific group of
people (McLeod, 2017) . When analysing this from a scientific
view there reveals lot of loop holes in this theory.
The methodology he has used is very
subjective because it depends on the opinion of the researcher. Opinions
normally lacks the validity of any data that is available. With this argument
Maslows theory cannot be accepted as scientific fact. Another fact is the major
difficulty associated with Maslow’s model, lies in its apparent rigidity (Trigg, 2004) .While few people
would deny that there are lower level and higher-level needs. Many would
dispute that people do tend to satisfy their need in relatively systematic way
from the bottom to the top as it were. Another criticism of Maslow’s need theory
is that no single motivation theory can explain any situation of all people that
is not uniform. (Neher, 2000) This theory also
fails to consider the cultural influence to people in a society.
As we have discussed, earlier there
is no scientific evidence to prove this theory. This theory fails to illustrate
and expand on the differences between social and intellectual needs of individualistic
societies and those raised in collectivist societies. This is more evident as
Maslow was from United States as a highly individualistic nation. The need that
come from individualistic societies are more self centered than those in collectivist
societies.
In conclusion Maslaws theory has
its limitations and weaknesses, related to environment and cultural influences.
References
McLeod, (2017). 'Simply
Psychology Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs', i(1), pp. 3-7.
Neher, A.,(2000). 'Maslow's Theory of Motivation' 31(3),
pp. 89-112.
Trigg, A. B., (2004). 'Review of Social Economy. Social
Critique of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, 62(3), pp. 393-406.
Maslow, A
(1943). ‘A theory of human motivation’. Psychological review, 50(4); PP.
200-330.

Good flow.. in the references Author, Year, Book title, Edition (If it is edited), City and Publisher to be mentioned.
ReplyDelete